Critical Thinking Skills in Elementary School Science Lessons

Isi Artikel Utama

Anugrah Dwicahyandi Oktavian
Rusijono
Fajar Arianto

Abstrak

This study aims to design and test the validity and reliability of a critical thinking assessment instrument based on Ennis’s theory, applied to the IPAS subject theme Exploring the World. The instrument was developed in the form of essay questions covering six critical thinking indicators: clarification, assumption, inference, evaluation, explanation, and self-regulation. The research adopted a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the Borg & Gall model. The try-out subjects were 30 sixth-grade students from Elementary School Pucangro Jombang. Validity was evaluated by three education and IPAS learning experts using Aiken’s V, while reliability was tested using Cronbach’s Alpha. Results showed that all items had high validity (Aiken’s V > 0.82) and strong reliability (α = 0.824). This instrument is considered appropriate as an assessment tool for evaluating elementary students' critical thinking skills in a thematic and global learning context. The use of the Exploring the World theme proved effective in encouraging students to analyze, compare, and draw critical conclusions about cultures, environments, and global life.

Rincian Artikel

Bagian

Articles

Cara Mengutip

Critical Thinking Skills in Elementary School Science Lessons. (2025). International Journal Universal Pedagogy Education, 1(1), 91-100. https://journal.tigaedukasiglobal.co.id/index.php/IJUPE/article/view/32

Referensi

Al-kfairy, M., Ahmed, S., & Khalil, A. (2024). Factors impacting users’ willingness to adopt and utilize the metaverse in education: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 15, 100459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100459

Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi Revisi). Rineka Cipta.

Azwar, S. (2015). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction (4th ed.). Longman.

Buin, E., da Mota Silveira, M. S. V., & Pavin, E. J. (2023). Adaptation and psychometric assessment of the instrument “Partners of adults with type 1 diabetes distress scale” in a Brazilian population. PEC Innovation, 2, 100155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100155

Carretta, C. M., Ridner, S. H., & Dietrich, M. S. (2014). Hope, hopelessness, and anxiety: A pilot instrument comparison study. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 28(4), 230–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2014.05.005

Chang, W.-L., & Sun, J. C.-Y. (2024). Evaluating AI’s impact on self-regulated language learning: A systematic review. System, 126, 103484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103484

Facione, P. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.

Firoozi, A. A., Firoozi, A. A., & Maghami, M. R. (2025). Harnessing photovoltaic innovation: Advancements, challenges, and strategic pathways for sustainable global development. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 27, 101058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101058

Göğebakan Yıldız, D., & Atman Uslu, N. (2024). Investigating the effect of digital storytelling on multicultural competencies and social justice: A mixed method study in psychological counseling education. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 103, 102065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102065

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Buku guru IPAS kelas VI SD kurikulum merdeka. Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan.

Leal Filho, W., Schmidberger, I., Sharifi, A., Vargas, V. R., Rampasso, I. S., Dibbern, T., Liakh, O., Aina, Y. A., Trevisan, L. V., Mbah, M. F., Anholon, R., & Kozlova, V. (2024). Design thinking for sustainable development: A bibliometric analysis and case study research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 455, 142285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142285

LeMire, S., Xu, Z., Dorsey, L. G., & Hahn, D. (2024). Information literacy skill mastery across the undergraduate degree: An examination of first-generation and continuing-generation students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(5), 102932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102932

Makaruk, H., Webster, E. K., Porter, J., Makaruk, B., Bodasińska, A., Zieliński, J., Tomaszewski, P., Nogal, M., Szyszka, P., Starzak, M., Śliwa, M., Banaś, M., Biegajło, M., Chaliburda, A., Gierczuk, D., Suchecki, B., Molik, B., & Sadowski, J. (2024). The fundamental motor skill proficiency among Polish primary school-aged children: A nationally representative surveillance study. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 27(4), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2023.12.007

Nemati-Vakilabad, R., Mojebi, M. R., Mostafazadeh, P., Jafari, M. J., Kamblash, A. J., Shafaghat, A., Abbasi, A. S., & Mirzaei, A. (2023). Factors associated with the critical thinking ability among nursing students: An exploratory study in Iran. Nurse Education in Practice, 73, 103814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103814

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2014). Educational assessment of students (7th ed.). Pearson.

Özer, D., & Şahin Altun, Ö. (2024). Nursing students’ mental health literacy and resilience levels: A cross-sectional study. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 51, 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2024.06.017

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research. SLO.

Qazi, A., & Al-Mhdawi, M. K. S. (2024). Exploring critical drivers of global innovation: A bayesian network perspective. Knowledge-Based Systems, 299, 112127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112127

Radović, S., Seidel, N., Menze, D., & Kasakowskij, R. (2024). Investigating the effects of different levels of students’ regulation support on learning process and outcome: In search of the optimal level of support for self-regulated learning. Computers & Education, 215, 105041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105041

Rothschild, Z. K., Abdollahi, A., & Pyszczynski, T. (2009). Does peace have a prayer? The effect of mortality salience, compassionate values, and religious fundamentalism on hostility toward out-groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 816–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.016

Salehian, A., Aghabayk, K., Seyfi, M., & Shiwakoti, N. (2023). Comparative analysis of pedestrian crash severity at United Kingdom rural road intersections and Non-Intersections using latent class clustering and ordered probit model. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 192, 107231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107231

Sanabria-Z, J., Cruz-Sandoval, M., Moreno-Romo, A., Bosch-Gómez, S., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2024). Research foresight in bridging open science and open innovation: Overview based on the complex thinking paradigm. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 8(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2023.08.002

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Vipu Vinayak, V. J., Deshmukh, K., Murthy, V. R. K., & Pasha, S. K. K. (2024). Conducting polymer based nanocomposites for supercapacitor applications: A review of recent advances, challenges and future prospects. Journal of Energy Storage, 100, 113551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.113551

Wu, T.-T., Sari, N. A. R. M., & Huang, Y.-M. (2024). Integrating extended formative assessment in flipped jigsaw learning: Promoting learning engagement and higher-order thinking skills in international business education context. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(1), 100930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100930

Zhang, Y., Guo, W., Ji, B., & Shi, H. (2025). An exploratory case study of Chinese college students’ critical thinking skills through interactive independent courses: evidence from behavioral and brain imaging. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 57, 101867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101867