Publication Ethics

This statement clarifies the ethical obligations for all parties involved in publishing articles in the Jurnal Global Pengabdian Masyarakat, including authors, editors, peer reviewers, and the publisher, namely CV. Tiga Edukasi Global. This statement is based on the COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. This journal follows these guidelines to ensure that each article is published with high ethics and maintains the integrity of the academic record.

Jurnal Global Pengabdian Masyarakat is a peer-reviewed journal that describes expected ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor-in-chief, the Editorial Board, the peer reviewers, and the publisher. The publication of an article in the Jurnal Global Pengabdian Masyarakat is an essential part of the development of a credible and respected network of knowledge and reflects the quality of the work of the authors and their institutions. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in publishing: the author, the journal editor, the reviewer, the publisher and the wider society.

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in the Jurnal Global Pengabdian Masyarakat involves a process of peer review. Jurnal Global Pengabdian Masyarakat is committed to developing an integrated and respected network of knowledge, reflecting the quality of research conducted by its authors and supporting institutions. Articles that have undergone peer review will contribute to the development of the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of ethical behavior that apply to all parties involved in publishing: the author, the editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the scientific society.

Publisher's Responsibilities

As the publisher of this journal, CV. Tiga Edukasi Global takes full responsibility for all stages of publishing. We take our ethical responsibilities very seriously and are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprints, or other commercial revenues do not influence editorial decisions.

Publishing Decision

The editor of the Jurnal Global Pengabdian Masyarakat Editorial Board is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. This decision will be based on the validity of the work and its relevance to readers and researchers. This decision will also be guided by the journal's policies and influenced by legal requirements regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Equalization of Assessment

Editors will evaluate manuscripts based on their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

Editors and editorial staff are required to keep the information contained in submitted manuscripts confidential, sharing information only with the relevant authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, editorial advisers, and the publisher.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by the editor for personal research purposes without the written permission of the author.

Reviewer Duties

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review plays an important role in assisting editors in decision making and providing feedback to authors to improve their manuscripts.

Timeliness

Any reviewer who feels unable to complete the review in a timely manner or feels unqualified to review a manuscript should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.

Confidentiality

Manuscripts received for review should be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must not discuss or share their manuscripts with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively and without personal criticism of the author. Reviewers should present their views clearly and with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant uncited work by the authors and alert the editor to any substantial similarity between the manuscript under consideration and any other published work of their own.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Information or ideas obtained during peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest, whether resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the authors or their institutions.